The da Vinci Review
Premee
I asked a buddy of mine with fairly good taste whether I should read ‘The da Vinci Code,’ watch the movie, or both, and he deliberated for a few minutes before replying, “Just read the book.” So that’s exactly what I did, being a long-time fan of Mr. da Vinci himself.
Now, I’m not going to leap into the murky waters of literary snobbery and complain that the book’s prose style consists of a big bowl of seven-layer cliché dip (though it does), nor will I cattily remark that Mr. Brown’s world must be pretty boring, what with every large space ‘yawning,’ every vaguely shiny thing ‘dazzling,’ and anything set higher than a metre off the ground ‘perching’; nor will I compare him to Thomas Harris, who also has a way of punishing a great premise with bad writing but redeems himself with felicitous little touches that make his writing pleasantly memorable. Nossir. Not me.
Anyway, I found the book a zippy page-turner with a good moral core (”Women are great: try one today!”), but - did anyone else think this? - weirdly and disappointingly truncated. I closed it and thought, “That was strange.”
It seems it was both dumbed-down and cut short. I mean, with a premise like that, there was room for another couple of hundred pages (not that I wanted it to be another ‘Les Miserables’ or whatever), the language didn’t have to be so insultingly bland, and, I don’t know, it sort of deserved more words or more scope or more characters or something. I just wasn’t satisfied with the amount of book I got, given the hype.
Also, um, before Silas really got into the ol’ Opus Dei thing, he was a U of A computing science student and we dated briefly in 2000. So that may be biasing my opinion slightly.
That, and the fact that cloggéd cloth wasn’t mentioned once.

Posted in General |
No Comments »




